72 Fifth Avenue, New York.

follow US

© 2018  GLOBAL URBAN FUTURES @ THE NEW SCHOOL

Website design by Ayesha Issadeen

212.229.5400  [ext. 1516]

Proudly created with Wix.com

Climate Change

Climate change ranks as one of the greatest threats to humanity. Communities of color and low-income and poor communities throughout the globe are often the most vulnerable and hardest hit by the effects of climate change. These populations also often have the least access to resources and institutional processes of decision making around mitigation, adaptation and resiliency strategies. Climate change impacts will further exacerbate existing conditions of inequality, poverty, disenfranchisement, urbanization, and displacement. Poor governance structures, the dominance of fossil fuel intensive extractive global industries in global politics and economic systems and weakened democratic political systems all fuel climate change and inequality around the world. Cities are seen as both the laboratories for innovation and change as well as ground zero for climate impacts and inequality. Most of the world’s population and most of the worlds poor will be inhabiting urban spaces vulnerable to changing climate impacts, further stressing both social and ecological systems to their limits.

 

Climate justice, today, is recognized as a powerful social movement that emerges from progressive political-economic and political-ecological ideas to combat climate change [1]. Climate justice demands systemic approaches to address social, environmental, and economic inequalities grounded in democratic practices and direct action. Climate justice advocates for a re-evaluation of the current economic system and challenge leaders to act with integrity towards the construction of a sustainable environmental future for all people and the environment [2].

 

 

 

[1] Bond, Patrick. Politics of Climate Justice: Paralysis Above, Movement Below. Paper Presented to the Gyeongsang University Institute of Social Science, Jinju. 2011. P

[2] Hoerner, Andrew, and Robinson, N. Just Climate Policy -- Just Racial Policy.  Racial and Gender Justice. The Race, Poverty, and Environmental Journal. 2009. P.32; P.35

inequality.

Inequality has returned to the center of public attention and political debate in a way that was unimaginable even a few years ago. The rising tide of inequality, in both industrialized and developing countries, has prompted concerns of social instability and faltering economic growth [1]. Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century raises the possibility that this is a long-term trend that will affect the global economy for decades to come. Cities are central to inequality, as the generators of economic growth and space where inequalities are most visible and contested. Understanding this trend and how cities can proactively address it is central to Global Urban Futures project.

 

Urban housing has become increasingly unaffordable for middle and low-income households. This is a reflection of the rising demand, but also of housing policies that have failed to address affordability and stimulate the production of homes for the people who make cities work. Real estate construction is focused on luring ‘luxury buyers’ and international capital; in central London, 60 percent of newly-built homes are purchased by overseas investors [2]. In both developed and developing countries, a growing gap between private and public wealth is leading to the increased adoption of private urban solutions, such as gated communities, private education, private security, and private transport [3]. These disparities are not inevitable; governments across the world, from Mexico to Ethiopia, and from France to Indonesia, have undertaken reforms of housing programs; showing that smart solutions can be implemented.

 

In developing countries, the massive growth of cities has not been matched by investments in urban infrastructure and services. The most visible consequence is the explosive spread of ‘slums’; mass areas of informal housing and employment. In Africa, despite strong per capita growth in income over the past 15 years, 62 percent of urbanites live and work in slums, and there was no discernible improvement in the provision of water and sanitation [4]. These informal areas have lower rates of education, health services, and policing, which contribute to unequal and unsafe places to grow up and live [5]. While cities in developing countries grow at a breakneck pace (90 percent of urban growth is in Africa and Asia), their populations skew young, and there are deep concerns that poor quality education coupled with a lack of job opportunities is creating a ‘demographic time bomb’. A new understanding of cities that considers intra-urban inequities is needed. This requires moving past national and aggregates when tracking progress on development indicators to a more granular detail of informal neighborhoods and looking beyond small-scale projects that reach a fraction of slum households to city-wide and regional plans that connect all urban residents to quality basic services and economic opportunities [6].

 

The lack of equitable investment in urban infrastructure and services is not limited to developing countries. Increased inequality is associated with declining investment in public goods in a range of contexts. The collapse of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina and the recent water crisis in Flint, Michigan illustrates the failure to invest in infrastructure that protects everyone, regardless of income, race, and ethnicity [7]. Unequal access to credit services for black Americans contributed to the discriminatory targeting of these households for sub-prime loans. The subsequent crisis wiped away black families’ wealth and assets for generations to come [8]. The growing disparities in income and wealth, often fractured along racial, ethnic and class lines, leads to growing competition and conflict between different groups in the city [9].

 

Inequality in urban areas is not inevitable. In spite of high rates of income inequality in the late 19th century and early 20th century, inclusive planning and investment in Europe and the US provided access to basic infrastructure, education and employment for rapidly growing urban populace. From the London underground to the New York’s city’s systems of reservoirs, the industrial age ensured affordable access to quality infrastructure and services to all city dwellers. More recently, cities across Latin America have been able to reduce high levels of inequality; the varying progress made demonstrates the extent to which municipalities can make a difference [10]. Alliances between civil society actors and policy makers can strengthen the democratic management of cities and ensure a shared and equitable urban future. In doing so, cities can make a significant contribution to an urgent global problem.

 

- Samantha Cocco-Klein March 28, 2016

 

 

[1] OECD, Does income inequality hurt economic growth? (Paris, OECD, 2014), UNDP, Humanity Divided: Confronting Inequality in Developing Countries (New York, UNDP, 2013)

[2] Andrew Heywood, London for sale? An assessment of the private housing market in London and the impact of growing overseas investment, (London; the Smith Institute, 2012)

[3] Maristella Svampa, Los Que Ganaron, (Buenos Aires, 2001), Edward Blakely and Mary Snyder, Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States, (Washington; Brookings, 1995)

[4] UN-Habitat, The State of African Cities 2010, (Nairobi: The United Nations Human Settlements Program, 2010)

[5] UNICEF, Children in an Urban World: The State of the World's Children 2012, (New York: United Nations Children’s Fund, 2012)

[6] Mark Swilling, Reconceptualising Urbanism, Ecology and Networked Infrastructures. In E. Pieterse, & A. Simone, Rogue Urbanisms: Emergent African Cities. (Rondebosch: Jacana Media, African Centre for Cities, 2013)

[7] William Morrish, After the Storm: Rebuilding Cities upon a Reflexive Urban Landscape. (New York: New School for Social Research, 2008). John Eligon, A Question of Environmental Racism in Flint. (New York Times, Jan. 21 2016)

[8] Sarah Burd-Sharps and Rebecca Rasch, Impact of the US Housing Crisis on the Racial Wealth Gap Across Generations, (Brooklyn, NY: Social Science Research Council, 2015)

[9] Rebecca Tippett, Avis Jones-Deweever, Maya Rockymorre, Darrick Hamilton and William Darity Jr., Beyond Broke: Why Closing the Racial Wealth Gap is a Priority for National Economic Security. (Center for Global Policy Solutions and Duke University, May 2014)

[10 ] UN-Habitat, Construction of More Equitable Cities: Public Policies for Inclusion in Latin America. (Nairobi, United Nations Human Settlements Program, CAF, development bank of Latin America, 2014)

jobless growth.

Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, economic growth and employment have been two of the main macroeconomic concerns and principal targets of economic policy, especially in post-recessionary periods. Nevertheless, in the late 70s economists started to observe how GDP and unemployment became less volatile and after 1984 the period of “The Great Moderation” started, posing great concern on how unemployment was no longer responding to output growth in the same way [1]. Although economic theory predicted a strong relationship between output growth and employment, in reality, unemployment was not declining as output grew and this tendency has become stronger first in the United States and OECD economies and more recently in emerging economies with high rates of GDP growth. The relationship between economic growth and job creation has changed, giving way to the phenomenon of jobless growth which has further consequences related to factor productivity and most importantly inequality and poverty.

 

Urban population has been continuously growing since the first Industrial Revolution while cities became the main drivers of economic growth. Lately, economic growth became an end in itself and this has reflected on growing inequality, especially in urban areas. This is why the distributive effects of jobless growth need to be addressed in the policy agenda in order to improve access to jobs and improve quality of life in urban areas. There is a strong need to recognize that economic growth per se does not contribute to better quality of life, and instead there should be a strong effort to guarantee quality jobs for those portions of the population that need to enter the labor market, especially the young.

 

The evolution of international thinking about cities over the past decade is slowly leading to more focused attention on the urban economy. Global and national discussions of employment are stuck at the macroeconomic level, ignoring that jobs can be most efficiently created in cities where their multiplying effects are greatest due to demographic and spatial advantages.  A better knowledge of the urban economy will lead to better policies that can address labor market imperfections and information asymmetries, contributing to better human capital formation and most importantly more and better jobs. In this sense, a broader city perspective should be concerned with the productivity of the city and its ability to generate jobs, investment in education and health, the efficiency and equity of its spatial form, the city contribution to greenhouse gases and the risks cities face from a changing climate, and the often determining role of urban policy in affecting equality of opportunity and access to services. It is time to demonstrate that cities are part of the solution to urgent global problems.

- Martha Susana Jaimes, 28 July 2016

 

[1] Dominicián Máté. “A Theoretical and Growth Accounting Approach of Jobless Growth”. Periodica Oeconomica, October 2010 (pp. 67-76).

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now